Vertical Motion: Distance Decreases Arithmetically Until Maximum Height

Number Puzzles 9th-10th Grade
PROBLEM
A ball thrown straight up in the air travels 33 inches in the first 10th of a second. in the next 10th of a second, the ball travels 30 inches. after each additional 10th of a second, the ball travels 3 inches less than it did during the proceeding 10th of a second. how long will it take before the ball starts coming back down? What is the total distance that the ball has traveled when it has reached It s maximum height?

What This Problem Teaches

  • Recognizing arithmetic sequences in physical motion contexts
  • Finding when a decreasing sequence reaches zero
  • Calculating sums of arithmetic sequences using formulas
  • Converting between discrete intervals and continuous time
  • Understanding the relationship between distance traveled and maximum height in projectile motion

Visualizing the Motion

Let's track the ball's motion in a table showing each tenth-second interval:

IntervalTime (seconds)Distance (inches)Pattern
1st0.0 to 0.13333 - 3(0) = 33
2nd0.1 to 0.23033 - 3(1) = 30
3rd0.2 to 0.32733 - 3(2) = 27
4th0.3 to 0.42433 - 3(3) = 24
............
12th1.1 to 1.2033 - 3(11) = 0

The ball reaches maximum height when its upward distance becomes zero — at the end of the 12th interval.

Solution: Method 1 — Arithmetic Sequence Analysis

Step 1 — Identify the pattern

The distances form an arithmetic sequence: 33, 30, 27, 24, ... where each term decreases by 3 inches. This is an arithmetic sequence with first term a₁ = 33 and common difference d = -3.

Step 2 — Find the general term formula

For an arithmetic sequence, the nth term is aₙ = a₁ + (n-1)d. Substituting our values:

aₙ = 33 + (n-1)(-3)
aₙ = 33 - 3(n-1)
aₙ = 33 - 3n + 3
aₙ = 36 - 3n

Step 3 — Find when the distance becomes zero

The ball starts coming down when the distance traveled in an interval becomes zero or negative. We need the last positive term, so we set aₙ = 0:

36 - 3n = 0
3n = 36
n = 12

So the 12th interval is when the distance becomes zero. This means maximum height is reached at 12 × 0.1 = 1.2 seconds.

Step 4 — Calculate total distance to maximum height

We need to sum the first 11 positive terms (intervals 1 through 11), since the 12th interval has zero distance. Using the arithmetic series formula S = n(a₁ + aₙ)/2:

First, find the 11th term:

a₁₁ = 36 - 3(11) = 36 - 33 = 3

Now calculate the sum:

S₁₁ = 11(a₁ + a₁₁)/2
S₁₁ = 11(33 + 3)/2
S₁₁ = 11(36)/2
S₁₁ = 11 × 18
S₁₁ = 198 inches

Solution: Method 2 — Direct Summation Approach

Step 1 — List all positive distances

Instead of using the formula, let's directly calculate each term until we reach zero:

Interval 1: 36 - 3(1) = 33 inches
Interval 2: 36 - 3(2) = 30 inches
Interval 3: 36 - 3(3) = 27 inches
Interval 4: 36 - 3(4) = 24 inches
Interval 5: 36 - 3(5) = 21 inches
Interval 6: 36 - 3(6) = 18 inches
Interval 7: 36 - 3(7) = 15 inches
Interval 8: 36 - 3(8) = 12 inches
Interval 9: 36 - 3(9) = 9 inches
Interval 10: 36 - 3(10) = 6 inches
Interval 11: 36 - 3(11) = 3 inches
Interval 12: 36 - 3(12) = 0 inches

Step 2 — Add the positive distances

Sum intervals 1 through 11:

Total = 33 + 30 + 27 + 24 + 21 + 18 + 15 + 12 + 9 + 6 + 3
Total = 198 inches

Step 3 — Confirm timing

The ball reaches zero upward velocity at the end of interval 12, which occurs at 12 × 0.1 = 1.2 seconds.

Time to maximum height: 1.2 seconds
Total distance traveled: 198 inches

Verification

Check the arithmetic sequence formula

Let's verify our 12th term calculation:

a₁₂ = 36 - 3(12) = 36 - 36 = 0 ✓

Check the sum using the alternative arithmetic series formula

We can also use S = n(2a₁ + (n-1)d)/2 for the first 11 terms:

S₁₁ = 11(2×33 + (11-1)(-3))/2
S₁₁ = 11(66 + 10(-3))/2
S₁₁ = 11(66 - 30)/2
S₁₁ = 11(36)/2
S₁₁ = 198 inches ✓

Physical reality check

The ball travels about 16.5 feet upward in 1.2 seconds, which is reasonable for a ball thrown with significant initial velocity. The decreasing distances make sense as gravity slows the ball's upward motion.

Common Pitfalls

✗ Including the zero-distance interval in the sum

Wrong calculation: Adding all 12 intervals gives the same sum since the 12th interval contributes 0, but this conceptual error often leads students to include negative distances from a hypothetical 13th interval.

Why it's wrong: Once the ball reaches maximum height, it's no longer traveling upward. We only sum the positive upward distances.

✗ Confusing interval number with time

Wrong answer: Saying the maximum height is reached at 12 seconds instead of 1.2 seconds.

Why it's wrong: The problem states each interval is one-tenth of a second, so 12 intervals = 12 × 0.1 = 1.2 seconds, not 12 seconds.

✗ Using the wrong arithmetic sequence formula

Wrong setup: Writing aₙ = 33 + (n-1)(-3) but then calculating as aₙ = 33 - 3n instead of aₙ = 36 - 3n.

Why it's wrong: This gives a₁ = 30 instead of 33, shifting the entire sequence. Always distribute carefully: 33 + (n-1)(-3) = 33 - 3n + 3 = 36 - 3n.

The Pattern Behind This

This problem illustrates a key principle in physics disguised as pure arithmetic. When an object moves under constant acceleration (like gravity), the distances traveled in equal time intervals form an arithmetic sequence.

General Pattern:
If initial distance per interval = d₀
If decrease per interval = k
Then: Distance in nth interval = d₀ - k(n-1)
Maximum height reached when: d₀ - k(n-1) = 0
So: n = (d₀/k) + 1
Total distance = Sum of positive terms

In our case: d₀ = 33, k = 3, so n = 33/3 + 1 = 12 intervals, reaching maximum at 12 × 0.1 = 1.2 seconds.

Important note: This discrete interval model is an approximation of continuous motion. In reality, projectile motion follows continuous quadratic equations, but the arithmetic sequence model provides an excellent approximation when time intervals are small.

Where This Shows Up in Real Life

  • Sports analysis: Basketball shot trajectories are analyzed using similar discrete time intervals to optimize shooting angles and understand ball flight patterns.
  • Engineering: Rocket trajectory calculations use step-wise approximations when continuous integration is computationally expensive.
  • Video game physics: Game engines often use discrete time steps (like 1/60th of a second) to calculate projectile motion, creating arithmetic sequences in velocity and position updates.

What If?

1
Different Deceleration
The ball travels 33 inches in the first tenth-second, but now decreases by 4 inches each interval instead of 3. How long until maximum height, and what's the total distance?
Step 1 — Set up the sequence

Distance formula: aₙ = 33 - 4(n-1) = 37 - 4n

Step 2 — Find when distance becomes zero

37 - 4n = 0, so n = 9.25. Since we need whole intervals, the 9th interval is the last positive one.

Step 3 — Calculate time and total distance

Time to maximum height: 9 × 0.1 = 0.9 seconds

Total distance: S₉ = 9(33 + 1)/2 = 9 × 17 = 153 inches

Verification

a₉ = 37 - 4(9) = 1 inch (last positive), a₁₀ = 37 - 4(10) = -3 (negative) ✓

2
Reverse Engineering
A ball reaches maximum height after exactly 1.5 seconds, traveling 40 inches in the first tenth-second. If distances decrease by a constant amount each interval, what is that decrease?
Step 1 — Determine number of intervals

1.5 seconds ÷ 0.1 = 15 intervals to maximum height

Step 2 — Set up the sequence formula

Let decrease = d. Distance formula: aₙ = 40 - d(n-1)

Step 3 — Use the condition that distance becomes zero

At 15th interval: 40 - d(15-1) = 0

40 - 14d = 0, so d = 40/14 = 20/7 ≈ 2.86 inches

Verification

a₁₅ = 40 - (20/7)(14) = 40 - 40 = 0 inches

3
Added Complexity
Two balls are thrown simultaneously. Ball A follows the original pattern (33, 30, 27...), Ball B travels 25, 22, 19... inches per tenth-second. When do they reach maximum height, and how much higher does Ball A go than Ball B?
Step 1 — Analyze Ball A (original problem)

Ball A: aₙ = 36 - 3n, reaches max at 1.2 seconds, total height = 198 inches

Step 2 — Analyze Ball B

Ball B: bₙ = 25 - 3(n-1) = 28 - 3n

Reaches zero when: 28 - 3n = 0, so n = 28/3 ≈ 9.33

Ball B reaches max after 9 intervals = 0.9 seconds

Step 3 — Calculate Ball B's total distance

b₉ = 28 - 3(9) = 1 inch (last positive term)

S₉ = 9(25 + 1)/2 = 9 × 13 = 117 inches

Final comparison

Ball A goes 198 - 117 = 81 inches higher than Ball B

4
Complete Journey
Using the original sequence (33, 30, 27...), assume the ball follows the same pattern on the way down: after the zero-distance interval, it travels 3, 6, 9... inches per tenth-second downward. What's the total distance traveled (up and down) after 2.4 seconds?
Step 1 — Upward journey analysis

From previous work: 11 intervals up (1.1 seconds), 198 inches total upward

Zero-distance interval at 1.2 seconds (maximum height reached)

Step 2 — Determine downward intervals

Total time = 2.4 seconds = 24 intervals

Upward: 11 intervals, Zero: 1 interval, Downward: 12 intervals

Step 3 — Calculate downward distances

Downward pattern: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36 inches

This is arithmetic with a₁ = 3, d = 3, for 12 terms

S₁₂ = 12(3 + 36)/2 = 12 × 19.5 = 234 inches

Total distance calculation

Total distance = 198 + 234 = 432 inches

Frequently Asked Questions

When distance per time interval decreases linearly, find when the interval distance becomes zero. In this problem, distances 33, 30, 27... decrease by 3 inches per tenth-second, so we solve 33 - 3(n-1) = 0 to get n = 12, meaning maximum height at 1.2 seconds.
Distance traveled is the total path length (always positive), while displacement is net change in position. For upward motion, both are equal until maximum height. Here the ball travels 198 inches total distance to reach its peak.
Constant acceleration creates arithmetic sequences in velocity and distance intervals. When distances per equal time period form an arithmetic sequence like 33, 30, 27..., the object has constant acceleration. The sequence continues until distance becomes zero at maximum height.
NJ
Neven Jurkovic, PhD

Professor of Computer Science, Palo Alto College, Alamo Colleges District, San Antonio, TX

Developer of Algebrator

Contact

This solution was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by Dr. Jurkovic for mathematical accuracy and pedagogical clarity.

2026-08-29