Maximizing Revenue: Price & Attendance Trade-off

Quadratic Applications 11th-12th Grade
Problem

An amusement park charges admission price (P) and averages 2000 tickets (T) sold per day. A survey shows that, for each increase in the admission cost, 100 fewer people would visit the park. Write an equation to express the revenue (R), in terms of a price increase of x dollars and then determine the admission price that gives the maximum revenue.

What This Problem Teaches

  • How to model revenue as the product of price and quantity when both depend on the same variable
  • Writing quadratic functions from real-world constraints and relationships
  • Finding maximum values using the vertex formula for parabolas
  • Understanding the economic concept of price elasticity through mathematical optimization
  • Interpreting why revenue functions create downward-opening parabolas in competitive markets

Solution: Method 1 — The Revenue Optimization Approach

Step 1 — Express price and attendance in terms of x

Let x represent the price increase in dollars. The current admission price is P dollars, so after the increase, the new price becomes:

New price = P + x

Currently, 2000 tickets are sold per day. For each $1 increase, 100 fewer people visit. So after an increase of x dollars, the number of tickets sold becomes:

New attendance = 2000 - 100x

Step 2 — Write the revenue function

Revenue equals price times quantity sold. Multiplying our expressions from Step 1:

R(x) = (P + x)(2000 - 100x)

Step 3 — Expand to standard quadratic form

Let's distribute this product to see the quadratic structure clearly:

R(x) = (P + x)(2000 - 100x)
R(x) = P(2000) - P(100x) + x(2000) - x(100x)
R(x) = 2000P - 100Px + 2000x - 100x²
R(x) = -100x² + (2000 - 100P)x + 2000P

Step 4 — Find the vertex for maximum revenue

This is a quadratic function in the form ax² + bx + c where:

  • a = -100 (negative, so parabola opens downward)
  • b = 2000 - 100P
  • c = 2000P

The maximum occurs at the vertex, where x = -b/(2a):

x = -(2000 - 100P)/(2(-100))
x = -(2000 - 100P)/(-200)
x = (2000 - 100P)/200
x = 10 - 0.5P

Step 5 — Calculate the optimal admission price

The optimal price increase is x = 10 - 0.5P. The optimal total admission price is:

Optimal price = P + x
Optimal price = P + (10 - 0.5P)
Optimal price = 10 + 0.5P

Solution: Method 2 — The Symmetry Approach

Step 1 — Identify the linear factors

Revenue is the product of two linear functions: price f(x) = P + x and attendance g(x) = 2000 - 100x. When we multiply two linear functions, we get a quadratic with specific symmetry properties.

Step 2 — Find where revenue equals zero

The revenue function R(x) = (P + x)(2000 - 100x) equals zero when either factor equals zero:

P + x = 0 → x = -P
2000 - 100x = 0 → x = 20

Step 3 — Use symmetry to find the maximum

For a quadratic function, the vertex (maximum) occurs exactly halfway between the x-intercepts. The x-intercepts are at x = -P and x = 20, so:

Maximum at x = (-P + 20)/2 = 10 - 0.5P

Step 4 — Calculate optimal price

The optimal admission price is P + x = P + (10 - 0.5P) = 10 + 0.5P, confirming our first method.

Revenue Function: R(x) = -100x² + (2000 - 100P)x + 2000P
Optimal Price Increase: x = 10 - 0.5P dollars
Optimal Admission Price: 10 + 0.5P dollars

Verification

Let's verify our formula works by testing with a specific value. Suppose the current price is P = $20:

Optimal increase: x = 10 - 0.5(20) = 0
Optimal price: 10 + 0.5(20) = 20

This means if the current price is already $20, no change is needed for maximum revenue. Let's check by substituting into our revenue function:

R(x) = -100x² + (2000 - 100×20)x + 2000×20
R(x) = -100x² + 0x + 40000
R(x) = 40000 - 100x²

This function is clearly maximized when x = 0, confirming our result. ✓

Let's also verify with P = $10:

Optimal increase: x = 10 - 0.5(10) = 5
Optimal price: 10 + 0.5(10) = 15

At x = 5: price = $15, attendance = 1500, revenue = $22,500
At x = 4: price = $14, attendance = 1600, revenue = $22,400
At x = 6: price = $16, attendance = 1400, revenue = $22,400

The revenue is indeed highest at our calculated optimum. ✓

Watch Out For These

✗ Treating P as a known number
Some students assume P has a specific value (like $10) and solve for a numerical answer. The problem asks for the general optimal price in terms of P. The answer 10 + 0.5P shows how the optimal price depends on the starting price.
✗ Forgetting the direction of the attendance change
Writing attendance as 2000 + 100x instead of 2000 - 100x. The problem clearly states that attendance decreases with price increases, so we subtract 100x.
✗ Maximizing the wrong function
Trying to maximize attendance (2000 - 100x) or price (P + x) separately, rather than their product. Revenue optimization requires balancing both factors.
✗ Sign error in the vertex formula
Using x = b/(2a) instead of x = -b/(2a). Since a = -100 and b = 2000 - 100P, the correct calculation is x = -(2000 - 100P)/(2×(-100)) = 10 - 0.5P.

The Math Beneath the Surface

This problem exemplifies a fundamental pattern in economics and optimization: revenue maximization with linear demand. The general form is:

R(x) = (base_price + increase) × (base_quantity - sensitivity × increase)

When expanded, this always creates a quadratic function R(x) = ax² + bx + c where a < 0 (downward parabola). The coefficient a represents the demand sensitivity—how much quantity drops per unit price increase.

In our case, the sensitivity is 100 customers per dollar, giving a = -100. Higher sensitivity (steeper demand curve) means a sharper revenue peak, while lower sensitivity creates a flatter optimum.

The key insight: optimal pricing always balances the trade-off between margin and volume. Raise prices too much, and you lose too many customers. Keep prices too low, and you miss profit potential. The mathematical optimum finds that perfect balance.

Real Applications

Concert venues and sports teams use this exact model when setting ticket prices. They survey price sensitivity and optimize for maximum gate revenue, often finding that moderate price increases boost total income despite smaller crowds.

Subscription services like Netflix apply similar analysis when adjusting monthly fees. They measure subscriber churn rates against price increases to find the revenue-maximizing price point.

Manufacturing companies use revenue optimization when launching products. Higher prices mean better profit margins but fewer units sold. The optimal price maximizes total revenue before considering production costs.

What If?

1
Different Sensitivity
A theme park currently charges $25 and sells 1800 tickets daily. Market research shows that for each $1 increase, 60 fewer people would visit. Find the price that maximizes revenue.
Step 1 — Set up the expressions

Price after increase: 25 + x
Attendance after increase: 1800 - 60x

Step 2 — Write revenue function

R(x) = (25 + x)(1800 - 60x)

Step 3 — Expand to quadratic form

R(x) = -60x² + (1800 - 1500)x + 45000 = -60x² + 300x + 45000

Step 4 — Find vertex

x = -300/(2×(-60)) = 300/120 = 2.5

Step 5 — Calculate optimal price

Optimal price = 25 + 2.5 = $27.50

Verification

At $27.50: attendance = 1650, revenue = $45,375
At $27: attendance = 1680, revenue = $45,360
At $28: attendance = 1620, revenue = $45,360 ✓

2
Profit Maximization
The same park from the original problem (P dollars, 2000 base, 100 drop per dollar) has daily operating costs of $18,000. If the current price is $15, what price maximizes daily profit?
Step 1 — Set up profit function

Profit = Revenue - Costs
Profit(x) = (15 + x)(2000 - 100x) - 18000

Step 2 — Expand revenue portion

Revenue = -100x² + (2000 - 1500)x + 30000 = -100x² + 500x + 30000

Step 3 — Write complete profit function

Profit(x) = -100x² + 500x + 30000 - 18000 = -100x² + 500x + 12000

Step 4 — Find maximum

x = -500/(2×(-100)) = 500/200 = 2.5

Step 5 — Calculate optimal price

Optimal price = 15 + 2.5 = $17.50

Verification

At $17.50: attendance = 1750, revenue = $30,625, profit = $12,625
Note: Profit optimization gives the same result as revenue optimization when costs are fixed! ✓

3
Target Revenue
Using the original model with P = $12, find all possible price increases that would generate exactly $30,000 in daily revenue.
Step 1 — Set up the equation

With P = 12: R(x) = (12 + x)(2000 - 100x) = 30000

Step 2 — Expand and rearrange

-100x² + 800x + 24000 = 30000
-100x² + 800x - 6000 = 0
x² - 8x + 60 = 0

Step 3 — Use quadratic formula

x = (8 ± √(64 - 240))/2 = (8 ± √(-176))/2

Step 4 — Interpret the result

Since the discriminant is negative, there are no real solutions.

Step 5 — Find maximum possible revenue

Maximum occurs at x = 4: price = $16, attendance = 1600, revenue = $25,600
$30,000 revenue is impossible with this demand curve.

4
Reverse Engineering
A water park knows that $22 is the revenue-maximizing price and that they currently charge $18 with 1500 daily visitors. If each $1 increase costs them 50 visitors, what would their attendance be at the optimal price?
Step 1 — Set up known information

Current: $18 price, 1500 visitors
Sensitivity: 50 fewer per $1 increase
Optimal price: $22

Step 2 — Use general optimization formula

For optimal price = 10 + 0.5P where P is current price:
22 = 10 + 0.5P
P = 24

Step 3 — Find the base attendance

If current price is $24 but they charge $18, that's a $6 decrease.
Base attendance = 1500 - 50×(-6) = 1500 + 300 = 1800

Step 4 — Calculate attendance at optimal price

Price increase from $24 to $22 is -$2.
Attendance = 1800 - 50×(-2) = 1800 + 100 = 1900

Verification

Wait—this doesn't make sense! Let me recalculate...
Actually, if $18 is current and $22 is optimal, the increase is +$4.
Optimal attendance = 1500 - 50×4 = 1300 visitors ✓

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you write a revenue function when price and quantity are both variables?+

Revenue equals price times quantity sold, so R = P × Q. When both price and quantity depend on the same variable (like a price increase x), substitute both expressions. In this problem, price becomes P + x and quantity becomes 2000 - 100x, giving R(x) = (P + x)(2000 - 100x).

Why is the maximum revenue always at the vertex of a parabola in these problems?+

Revenue functions in price-demand problems are quadratic because you multiply two linear expressions (price and quantity). This creates a downward-opening parabola since higher prices eventually reduce total sales enough to decrease revenue. The vertex represents the optimal balance between price and volume.

What's the difference between optimizing price increase versus optimizing total price?+

Price increase (x) is the change from current price, while total price is the final amount charged. Here, if the optimal increase is x = 10 - 0.5P, then the optimal total price is P + x = 10 + 0.5P. The key insight is that the optimal total price depends on the starting price P.

NJ
Neven Jurkovic, PhD

Professor of Computer Science, Palo Alto College, Alamo Colleges District, San Antonio, TX

Developer of Algebrator

Contact

This solution was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by Dr. Jurkovic for mathematical accuracy and pedagogical clarity.

2026-05-20