Solving a Car Rental System: Small & Large Cars
What This Problem Teaches
- How to translate word constraints into algebraic equations
- Setting up and solving two-variable linear systems
- Using substitution method when one equation easily isolates a variable
- Recognizing capacity problems where items contribute differently to a total
- Verifying solutions make sense in the original real-world context
Solution: Method 1 — The Substitution Approach
This problem gives us two pieces of information that we can turn into two equations. Let's define our variables first, then build our system.
Step 1 — Define variables
Let s = number of small cars rented
Let l = number of large cars rented
Step 2 — Write the constraint equation
We're told "The students rented 3 more large cars than small cars." This translates directly to:
Step 3 — Write the capacity equation
Each small car holds 4 people, each large car holds 6 people, and the total capacity is 58 people:
Step 4 — Substitute the first equation into the second
Since l = s + 3, we can replace l in the capacity equation:
4s + 6s + 18 = 58
10s + 18 = 58
10s = 40
s = 4
Step 5 — Find the number of large cars
Now that we know s = 4, we can find l:
Solution: Method 2 — The Capacity Breakdown Strategy
Instead of using substitution, let's think about the problem structurally. Since there are 3 more large cars than small cars, we can think of the fleet as having equal pairs plus 3 extra large cars.
Step 1 — Isolate the extra capacity
The 3 extra large cars contribute 3 × 6 = 18 people to the total. Remove this from the total capacity:
Step 2 — Set up equal pairs
Now we have an equal number of small and large cars accounting for 40 people. If there are n pairs, then:
10n = 40
n = 4
Step 3 — Calculate total cars
We have 4 equal pairs plus 3 extra large cars:
Large cars: 4 + 3 = 7
Verification
Let's check both conditions from the original problem:
Constraint check
Do we have 3 more large cars than small cars?7 - 4 = 3 ✓
Capacity check
Do the cars hold exactly 58 people?4 small cars × 4 people + 7 large cars × 6 people = 16 + 42 = 58 ✓
| Car Type | Number of Cars | People per Car | Total People |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| Large | 7 | 6 | 42 |
| Total | 11 | — | 58 |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
The phrase "3 more large cars than small cars" means you add 3 to the number of small cars. If there are 4 small cars, then large cars = 4 + 3 = 7, not 4 × 3 = 12.
Don't mix up which car holds which number of people. Small cars hold 4 people, large cars hold 6 people. The equation is
4s + 6l = 58, not 6s + 4l = 58.
The problem asks for both the number of small cars AND the number of large cars. Don't stop after finding s = 4; you need to calculate l = s + 3 = 7.
The Pattern Behind This
This is a classic constraint-capacity system. The general structure is:
- One equation expressing a relationship between quantities
- One equation expressing how those quantities contribute to a total
Constraint: y = x + k (or some other linear relationship)
Capacity: ax + by = total
This pattern appears in many contexts: workers with different productivity rates, investments with different returns, containers with different volumes. The substitution method works particularly well when the constraint equation easily isolates one variable.
Why This Matters
Capacity and resource allocation problems like this appear frequently in real life:
- Event planning: Mixing round tables (8 people) and rectangular tables (6 people) for a wedding
- Transportation logistics: Combining different vehicle types to move cargo or passengers efficiently
- Manufacturing: Using machines with different production rates to meet a target output
- Staffing decisions: Balancing full-time and part-time employees to cover required work hours
Four "What-If?" Problems
Let s = small cars, l = large cars
Constraint: l = s + 2
Capacity: 4s + 6l = 44
4s + 6(s + 2) = 444s + 6s + 12 = 4410s = 32s = 3.2
l = s + 2 = 3.2 + 2 = 5.2
This gives fractional cars, which isn't realistic. The numbers in this problem don't work out to whole vehicles, suggesting the total capacity or constraint needs adjustment for a real scenario.
3.2 small cars and 5.2 large cars (though this would need whole numbers in practice)
Let s = small cars, l = large cars, v = vans
l = s + 2 (2 more large than small)v = s (same number of vans as small cars)
4s + 6l + 8v = 66
4s + 6(s + 2) + 8s = 664s + 6s + 12 + 8s = 6618s = 54s = 3
l = s + 2 = 3 + 2 = 5v = s = 3
3(4) + 5(6) + 3(8) = 12 + 30 + 24 = 66 ✓
3 small cars, 5 large cars, and 3 vans
Let x = people per small car
Then x + 2 = people per large car
5x + 8(x + 2) = 86
5x + 8x + 16 = 8613x + 16 = 8613x = 70x = 70/13 ≈ 5.38
Since we need whole people, let's verify: if small cars hold 5 people and large cars hold 7 people:5(5) + 8(7) = 25 + 56 = 81 ≠ 86
If small cars hold 6 people, large cars hold 8 people:5(6) + 8(8) = 30 + 64 = 94 ≠ 86
Each small car holds 70/13 ≈ 5.4 people (The problem numbers don't yield a clean integer solution)
Let s = small cars, l = large cars
Constraint: l = s + 1
Capacity: 4s + 6l = 38
Cost: 40s + 60l = 420
4s + 6(s + 1) = 384s + 6s + 6 = 3810s = 32s = 3.2
If s = 3.2, then l = 4.2
Cost check: 40(3.2) + 60(4.2) = 128 + 252 = 380 ≠ 420
Let's try s = 3, l = 4:
Capacity: 4(3) + 6(4) = 12 + 24 = 36 ≠ 38
Try s = 4, l = 5:
Capacity: 4(4) + 6(5) = 16 + 30 = 46 ≠ 38
The three constraints (relationship, capacity, and cost) are inconsistent with these particular numbers. In real problems, you'd need to adjust one of the constraints.
This system has no solution with the given constraints — a reminder that not all word problems have neat answers!
Frequently Asked Questions
2026-11-09